When leveraged positions meet macro uncertainty, the result is a liquidation cascade that wiped out 396,000 traders and pushed Bitcoin below $85,000 for the first time since April.
In a span of 72 hours, the crypto market experienced its most severe stress test since the 2022 collapse. Bitcoin plunged from its October peak of $126,080 to as low as $81,600 — a 35% drawdown that erased year-to-date gains and triggered nearly $2 billion in leveraged liquidations.
The cascade was a structural deleveraging event that revealed how record-high margin debt, evaporating institutional liquidity, and automated risk-management systems can amplify volatility beyond fundamental catalysts.
The liquidation engine kicked into gear on November 20-21, as Bitcoin breached critical support at $85,000. According to CoinGlass data, $964 million in Bitcoin positions alone were forcibly closed, part of a broader $1.7–2.0 billion sweep across crypto markets. Unlike orderly selloffs, this was a cascade: liquidations begetting more liquidations.
Total liquidations over 24 hours came in at $1.7–2.0 billion, marking the largest figure since the $19 billion event in October. About 396,000 traders were liquidated, the highest single-day count of 2025. The biggest individual loss was a $36.7 million BTC position on Hyperliquid. Bitcoin funding rates fell sharply from –20% to –35%, indicating forced long exits. Perpetual futures open interest dropped 35% from the October peak, moving from $94 billion to $61 billion, representing the fastest unwinding of the current bull cycle. The Fear & Greed Index hit 11, an extreme-fear level not seen since late 2022.
The mechanism was straightforward in theory but brutal in execution: as Bitcoin broke below $90,000, it triggered stop-losses for leveraged longs. These automated sells pushed prices lower, which then hit the liquidation prices of other leveraged positions, creating a self-reinforcing loop. Within four hours on November 21, $1.9 billion in positions vaporized, with 85% being long liquidations.
What made this cascade particularly notable was its detachment from crypto-specific news. The initial shock came from traditional markets. As The Kobeissi Letter documented, the S&P 500 erased $2 trillion in market cap in just 5 hours on November 20 — its fastest reversal since "Liberation Day." Nvidia swung from +6% to -3% despite record $55 billion revenue, with no new headlines to justify the move.
This equity volatility rippled into crypto immediately. With U.S. margin debt at a record $1.13 trillion and institutional investors holding record-high leverage across both asset classes, the correlation between stocks and crypto reached its tightest level since 2022. When risk-off sentiment hit, crypto — being the highest-beta asset — absorbed the most severe selling pressure.
Q3 2025 saw crypto-collateralized borrowing surge to a record $73.6 billion, with DeFi lending alone jumping 55% to $41 billion, according to Galaxy Research. Unlike the 2021–22 cycle, this leverage was better collateralized, but the concentration in perpetual futures created systemic risk.
Bitcoin ETFs, which had been the primary institutional on-ramp in 2025, reversed course dramatically. BlackRock's IBIT recorded its largest-ever single-day outflow: $523 million on November 19, part of a $3.79 billion monthly exodus — the worst since ETF launch.
November ETF Outflows Breakdown:
This wasn't capitulation, but institutional recalibration — as Vincent Liu, CIO at Kronos Research, explained: "Big allocators are trimming risk, tightening exposure, and testing entry points until macro signals turn clear."
Modern crypto markets are dominated by algos and auto-deleveraging (ADL) systems. When the cascade began, exchanges' risk engines kicked in simultaneously. The result: $450 million liquidated within 2 hours after the November 20 jobs report, as bots executed stop-losses faster than human traders could intervene.
Open interest in Bitcoin perpetual futures fell 35% from October's $94 billion peak, but more concerning was how it disappeared. The liquidation cascade revealed that much of the "liquidity" was actually stacked bids from levered longs themselves. When those bids evaporated, order books became razor-thin, allowing a $50 million sell order to move the price by hundreds of dollars.
Typically, funding rates signal market sentiment. But as VanEck's research noted, protocols like Ethena (with $14B TVL in October, now $8.3B) had accumulated massive basis positions (long spot, short perps), artificially depressing funding rates. This made the indicator unreliable as a warning signal.
On-chain data shows a stark divergence:
The oldest whales (>10Y) held steady, while corporate treasury companies like Strategy, Metaplanet, and others have "basically stopped buying," according to CryptoQuant's Julio Moreno. This shift from institutional accumulation to retail-driven speculation left the market structurally vulnerable.
The November liquidations didn't just wipe out positions — they wiped out confidence in three key areas:
The promise of "institutional adoption" via ETFs has a dark side: those same institutions can exit en masse. With $3.79B in outflows, the question becomes: Were ETFs a permanent shift or just a momentum trade?
Crypto markets have embraced high leverage as a differentiator, with platforms offering up to 100:1 (Hyperliquid, Aster). But as Galaxy Research warned: "The market is on firmer collateral footing, but the sheer scale of leverage creates systemic risk that exceeds 2021 levels."
CryptoQuant's Bull Score Index fell to 20/100, its most bearish reading in the current bull cycle that began in January 2023. Bitcoin now trades below its 365-day moving average of $102,000 — the same signal that marked the 2022 bear market. If the four-year cycle holds, the 2022–2025 bull run may be concluding.
If the Fear & Greed Index below 15 historically signals swing lows, Bitcoin could find support at $80,000–$82,000. Open interest reset and funding rate normalization would allow for a relief rally.
With ETF outflows continuing and corporate treasury demand absent, Bitcoin could test $75,000–$78,000 by year-end. The 365-day MA at $102K becomes strong resistance.
A break below $75,000 could trigger another $5–10B liquidation wave, pushing Bitcoin toward $60,000 and initiating a true bear market. This would require a macro catalyst (Fed hiking, recession fears).
The November liquidations underscore a critical lesson: in crypto, yield must be engineered for volatility, not despite it. While leveraged traders faced margin calls, Coinchange's BTC Yield Strategies operated through the cascade with daily NAV reporting and no forced liquidations — a stark contrast to the broader market.
Coinchange offers two institutional-grade BTC-denominated portfolios that generate yield without directional leverage risk:
The Conservative portfolio targets an 8.00% APY using a mix of 35% DeFi market-neutral strategies and 20% low-risk directional exposure, with a maximum monthly drawdown of –0.39%.
The Balanced portfolio targets 12.00% APY with a composition of 15% DeFi market-neutral, 10% low-risk, 25% mid-risk, and 5% high-risk strategies, and it has a maximum monthly drawdown of –3.57%.
Key Operational Safeguards:
While the November cascade liquidated 396,000 leveraged positions, Coinchange's portfolios remained fully collateralized and delta-hedged. The Conservative portfolio's 11.4% cumulative return in 2025 was achieved with:
This is the difference between trading BTC and earning yield on BTC. As Coinchange's research has shown: headline APY means nothing without verifiable infrastructure. During the cascade, the platform's real-time risk engine automatically rebalanced from directional strategies to basis trades and repo markets, capturing the very volatility that destroyed leveraged accounts.
The November event exposed a fundamental market segmentation:
Coinchange's yield strategies are engineered for the latter. By denominating returns in BTC and maintaining strict risk budgets, the portfolios allow long-term holders to accumulate more Bitcoin through the drawdown — precisely when corporate treasuries have stopped buying.
For Long-Term Holders:
For Active Traders:
For Institutional Allocators:
The November cascade validates 2025's key theme: certainty over yield. As Coinchange's research has shown, institutional investors moved $3.79 billion out of BTC ETFs not because they lost faith in Bitcoin, but because they lost faith in unhedged exposure during macro uncertainty.
The 2025 playbook is now clear: demand transparent, risk-managed yield infrastructure. As PwC's 2025 Global Crypto Regulation Report documented, regulators increasingly expect "verifiable operational controls and clearer governance for crypto activity." Platforms that provide daily NAVs, third-party audits, and bankruptcy-remote custody — like Coinchange — are no longer optional; they're table stakes.
The November 2025 liquidations were painful but necessary. They reset open interest from speculative highs, reminded investors that leverage is a liability, and proved that institutional-grade yield infrastructure can withstand volatility that liquidates traditional leveraged positions.
For crypto to evolve to a $10+ trillion asset class, it needs:
As the market rebuilds, yield-bearing strategies that prioritize credibility over maximum APY will be the foundation of the next cycle.
Coinchange's Bitcoin yield approach exemplifies this shift: 8–12% target APY, daily NAVs, zero leverage on client assets, and multi-manager diversification. In a market that just liquidated nearly 400,000 traders, that's not just yield — it's survival.
A combination of record margin debt ($1.13T), high leverage ratios (up to 100:1), institutional ETF outflows ($3.79B), and macro volatility from equity markets created a self-reinforcing cascade. When Bitcoin broke below $90,000, automated liquidations triggered margin calls that wiped out $964M in BTC positions alone.
November 2025 saw the second-largest single-day liquidation cascade (after October's $19B event). The 396,000 traders liquidated exceeds the March 2024 and August 2024 events, but the market structure is healthier — most positions were collateralized, and systemic failures were avoided.
An index reading of 11 indicates "Extreme Fear," historically associated with swing lows. However, with Bitcoin below its 365-day MA and institutional flows negative, technical resistance at $102K remains formidable. The index is a sentiment gauge, not a timing signal.
Long-term investors should focus on earning Bitcoin rather than timing Bitcoin. Deploying BTC into risk-managed yield strategies allows accumulation during fear cycles without adding leverage risk. Wait for technical confirmation (higher highs/lows) before increasing directional exposure.
Coinchange's portfolios are non-directional at the core (35–15% delta-neutral), fully collateralized, and generate yield through basis trades, repo, and lending — not leverage. Daily NAV reporting and weekly liquidity prevent the gating and forced selling that liquidated leveraged traders.
When Only 1 in 10 Crypto Assets Earn Yield: The On-Chain Opportunity You’re Overlooking
Why On-Chain Yield Must Earn Credibility Before Yielding Returns