"All U.S. markets will be on-chain within two years."
When SEC Chair Paul Atkins dropped that prediction during his recent interview, the financial industry collectively paused. Not because the idea seemed far-fetched — most institutional players have been preparing for tokenization behind closed doors for years — but because a sitting SEC Chair had just given the most aggressive timeline yet for the complete transformation of America's financial infrastructure.
Atkins isn't speculating about a distant future at all. His "Project Crypto" initiative, launched in his first 30 days, is already mapping the regulatory pathways for tokenizing everything from Treasury bonds to corporate equities. The infrastructure to support this vision isn't theoretical; it's already processing billions daily through a technology most associated with crypto trading: stablecoins.
The $35.78 billion tokenized real-world asset (RWA) market represents just 0.08% of global securities, yet it's growing at a pace that makes Atkins' timeline plausible. TRMLabs research reveals stablecoin transaction volume hit $4 trillion in the first seven months of 2025 — an 83% year-over-year increase that suggests exponential, not linear, adoption.
What makes 2025 different from previous "crypto transformation" narratives? Three converging forces:
At the current growth trajectory, stablecoin transaction volume could surpass legacy payment networks within three years, processing $250 billion daily — greater than Visa and Mastercard's combined throughput. The question isn't whether tokenization will happen, but whether traditional institutions can adapt fast enough.
Stablecoins have evolved from crypto's "risk-off" asset into the settlement layer for the next financial system. They now account for nearly 30% of all on-chain activity, but more importantly, they're solving real problems that legacy rails cannot.
The operational advantages are stark. While legacy rails like SWIFT and Fedwire require 1-5 business days for settlement and remain offline on nights and weekends, stablecoins such as USDC and USDT settle in under 30 seconds, 24/7/365. Cross-border costs plummet from $25-50 plus FX spreads to less than $0.01. Opaque routing through correspondent banks becomes fully transparent on-chain, and manual, paperwork-heavy processes are replaced by smart contract automation.
The implications extend beyond efficiency. For the 1.4 billion unbanked globally, stablecoins offer participation in the dollar economy without requiring traditional banking relationships. For multinational corporations, they eliminate the $200 trillion correspondent banking system's delays and counterparty risks.
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has talked about the “tokenization of all assets”, and this only accelerates this trend. The infrastructure is being built from the ground up, not top-down.
Regulatory uncertainty has been the primary barrier to institutional stablecoin adoption. That barrier collapsed in 2025.
The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, enacted in July 2025, creates a federal charter system for stablecoin issuers with three core requirements:
The impact was immediate. Circle's USDC reserves, already 85% in short-term Treasuries, saw institutional inflows surge 40% post-enactment. Coinbase's USDC yield product attracted $12 billion in deposits, offering 4.1% APY while maintaining full liquidity.
MiCA regulations, fully implemented in early 2025, have issued over 40 Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASSP) licenses, with national regulators imposing €540 million in fines for non-compliant stablecoin operations. More significantly, nine major European banks — including Deutsche Bank, Santander, and BBVA — announced a euro stablecoin consortium set to launch in Q1 2026.
This creates a bifurcated but clear regulatory environment: compliant stablecoins operate with bank-grade oversight, while unregulated issuers face existential legal risk.
Hong Kong's stablecoin licensing framework, operational since mid-2025, has approved its first three issuers, with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority indicating more licenses will follow in early 2026. This positions Hong Kong as the regulated gateway to China's state-backed tokenization efforts, including the mBridge cross-border CBDC project.
The "proof-of-concept" phase ended in 2024. 2025 is about scaled production.
Tokenized money market funds represent the clearest product-market fit. The market has grown 3,184% in 12 months:
They're yielding assets held by hedge funds, corporate treasuries, and registered investment advisors seeking same-day settlement and 24/7 liquidity.
JPMorgan's JPM Coin System processes over $1 billion in daily tokenized deposits for institutional clients, enabling:
Critically, JPM Coin isn't a stablecoin — it's tokenized commercial bank money, backed 1:1 by deposits at JPMorgan. This distinction matters: it preserves deposit funding for the bank while offering stablecoin-like utility.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore's Project Guardian, involving DBS, HSBC, and Standard Chartered, has executed over $500 million in tokenized cash foreign exchange and securities trades since January 2025. Settlement time dropped from two days to three hours, with 40% cost reduction.
Meanwhile, the mBridge project — linking central banks in China, Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE — settled $120 million in cross-border CBDC transactions in Q2 2025, demonstrating that tokenized central bank money can coexist with private stablecoins in a hybrid system.
The most significant development for DeFi-native institutions is Securitize and VanEck's VBILL tokenized Treasury fund launching on Aave's permissioned Horizon instance. This allows institutional borrowers to use tokenized Treasuries as collateral for stablecoin loans, creating a fully on-chain repo market with 6-8% yields.
Tokenization's promise doesn't eliminate risk, which is why institutions must navigate new failure modes.
Even regulated stablecoins face de-pegging risk. USDC traded at $0.87 during the March 2024 banking crisis when its reserves at Silicon Valley Bank were frozen. While it recovered within 48 hours, the event proved that "stable" is conditional on reserve accessibility.
The GENIUS Act's real-time attestation requirement helps, but doesn't guarantee instant redemption during market stress. Institutions should model liquidity scenarios assuming 24-72 hour redemption delays.
The largest stablecoin loss in 2025 wasn't a de-pegging — it was a custody breach. A compromised multi-sig wallet at a mid-size custodian resulted in $180 million USDT theft. The attack vector wasn't cryptographic; it was social engineering of wallet signers.
Leading custodians now require:
Yet the fundamental risk remains: bearer assets require bearer responsibility. There's no "forgot password" recovery in self-custody.
Perhaps the most overlooked risk: stablecoin holders are unsecured creditors in issuer bankruptcies. Unlike FDIC-insured deposits, stablecoins represent a claim on reserves, not direct ownership. If Circle or Tether entered Chapter 11, holders would likely face 6-12 month recovery processes, potentially receiving less than 100 cents on the dollar.
Tokenized deposits like JPM Coin avoid this by never leaving the bank's balance sheet. For true stablecoins, institutions must assess issuer credit risk alongside technological risk.
With 200+ stablecoins issued across 15+ blockchains, liquidity fragmentation is real. While bridges exist, they've suffered $2.8 billion in exploits since 2021. The emerging solution isn't technical — it's market-driven: liquidity concentrates in 2-3 winners (USDC, USDT, and one regulated euro stablecoin).
Based on McKinsey's market maturity framework, here are the signals that tokenization has moved from speculative to structural:
Corporate treasurers now expect T+0 settlement for all liquid assets. If it doesn't settle the same day, it's not cash management — it's credit risk. This pressure forces institutional adoption.
Stripe's $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge (a stablecoin payments platform) in August 2025 validated stablecoins as fintech infrastructure. PayPal's PYUSD reached $500 million circulation by integrating with existing merchant networks. Expect more deals as traditional payment processors acquire crypto-native capabilities.
Six U.S. banks, including a top-5 institution, are reportedly in discussions to jointly issue a regulated stablecoin. The OCC's approval of Figure Bank's stablecoin charter in September 2025 opened the door for national banks to become issuers, not just custodians.
The $8.8 billion tokenized Treasury market is projected to reach $50 billion by end-2025. This isn't just a product — it's a new asset class that competes directly with money market funds, offering 24/7 liquidity and blockchain programmability.
Coinbase's Layer-2 network Base now processes 4 million daily transactions with <$0.01 fees. MetaMask Institutional has onboarded 1,200 funds, offering DeFi access with compliance tooling. The "on-ramp" problem is largely solved.
The most critical indicator: stablecoin transaction volume is increasingly uncorrelated with crypto trading volumes. Cross-border payments, remittances, and institutional settlement now represent 42% of stablecoin usage, up from 18% in 2024. This is the "utility phase" beginning.
Atkins' two-year timeline demands immediate action. Here's what institutions should prioritize:
The talent shortage is acute. Most banks laid off crypto teams in 2023-2024. Now, blockchain engineers command 2-3x traditional fintech salaries. Smart move: partner with firms like Fortress Trust or Anchorage to outsource custody while building in-house DeFi expertise.
This isn't optional. Start with:
Most boards still view stablecoins through a 2021 "crypto casino" lens. Commission an independent audit of tokenization's impact on your deposit funding model and fee revenue. The results will be sobering: McKinsey estimates banks could lose 15-25% of deposit funding if stablecoins capture just 10% of cross-border flows.
The GENIUS Act requires stablecoin issuers to register with the Fed and SEC. Even if you're not issuing, you'll need to demonstrate compliance with stablecoin handling standards. Early engagement with the OCC and state banking regulators can secure grandfathering provisions.
"Build it and they will come" failed for early tokenization projects. Instead:
While payment stablecoins must remain unyielding under GENIUS Act regulations, Coinchange bridges this gap by transforming idle stablecoins into actively managed, risk-adjusted income streams — delivering 10-25% APY on stablecoins while maintaining institutional-grade transparency and compliance.
We operate as a fund-of-funds across multitudes of independent, low-correlation strategies:
This captures the permanent structural arbitrage of tokenized finance: payment stablecoins stay regulated and liquid, while Coinchange generates institutional yield on the same assets.
Paul Atkins' two-year prediction is quite bullish, but it is setting a fair timeline of institutional crypto adoption in terms of tokenization. The institutions that thrive will be those that treat stablecoins not as a crypto experiment, but as the settlement infrastructure for the next generation of financial markets. The technology is ready, the regulation is clear, and the use cases are scaling. The only remaining question is whether your firm will be a participant or a spectator in the on-chain future.
The three dominant use cases are: (1) Cross-border payments and remittances (faster, cheaper settlement), (2) Treasury management (24/7 liquidity with yield), and (3) Trading collateral (instant settlement for tokenized securities). Combined, these represent 68% of institutional stablecoin demand according to Chainalysis.
The GENIUS Act requires 100% reserve backing, which prevents issuers from rehypothecating reserves for yield. However, it doesn't restrict third-party platforms like Coinchange from generating yield through DeFi lending and liquidity provision. This creates a two-tier system: stablecoin issuers become utilities, while yield platforms become the "banks" of tokenized finance.
Tokenized deposits (e.g., JPM Coin) are commercial bank money tokenized on a private blockchain, backed 1:1 by deposits at the issuing bank. Stablecoins (e.g., USDC) are liabilities of a private issuer, backed by cash equivalents but not directly by bank deposits. Tokenized deposits preserve bank funding; stablecoins disintermediate it.
Evaluate three layers: (1) Reserve quality (check attestations from Grant Thornton or BDO), (2) Issuer credit risk (treat as unsecured creditor), and (3) Smart contract risk (audit reports from OpenZeppelin or Trail of Bits). Coinchange's risk engine automates this analysis across 200+ protocols.
When Only 1 in 10 Crypto Assets Earn Yield: The On-Chain Opportunity You’re Overlooking
Why On-Chain Yield Must Earn Credibility Before Yielding Returns